-
-
This page is Public
-
Public
-
-
This page is Public
International R&D linkages of universities and PRIs
International R&D linkages refer to different ways of international collaboration in scientific and technological research. International R&D linkages can take different formats, including: international co-invention and co-authorship, licensing, mobility of researchers and engineers, dissemination of research results through international conferences and journals, open access to research data and networks, joint research project calls and funds, institutes and facilities, and foreign direct investment (FDI) (OECD, 2013; Archibugi and Iammarino, 2002; Narula and Hagedoorn, 1999). These linkages allow universities, PRIs and companies to tap into global pools of knowledge, to have access to major research facilities and human resources, to share costs, to obtain more rapid results, and to manage the large-scale efforts needed to effectively address challenges of a regional or global nature (OECD, 2012). Greater access to knowledge fosters a wider scope of scientific and industrial investigation and discovery. The development of R&D linkages involving universities, PRIs and companies across countries can be facilitated by institutional relationships, such as formal work agreements and co-operation activities.
Potential benefits of international R&D linkages
- Promoting economic development: the development of international R&D activities can strengthen regional and national research and innovation systems and have significant positive multiplier effects on the economy.
- Addressing global challenges: mobilising international STI resources to address global challenges such as climate change, aging and energy requires collaboration and the sharing and exchange of scientific data across borders.
- Reducing the costs of research, development and innovation activities, through co-ordination and harmonisation of priorities and work plans, technology transfer initiatives, and the international exchange of scientific and technical information.
- Enhancing technological spillovers and knowledge diffusion: technology and knowledge transfer can develop the innovation base, resulting in new and emerging technologies, and opening up opportunities for creative synergy from the discussion of various ideas and approaches.
- Increasing the bidding and winning in international calls for research funding: the availability of significant funding enables participants to up-scale their research capabilities, attract and recruit key international talent, and to conduct fundamental research. The bidding process also fosters international collaboration development, as bids must generally involve companies, academics and PRIs from across national borders.
- Enhancing opportunities for co-publication and co-patenting: creating new knowledge and developing relationships between international researchers, engineers, scientists, etc.
Incentives to developing international R&D linkages
- Accessing prestigious international research networks: collaboration with prestigious research organisations can be an attractive pull factor. These networks create opportunities for research organisations and researchers to interact with networks and organisations of strong reputation, significant resource and technology capabilities, and with “star” scientists, engineers and researchers.
- Developing the economy and the relevance of national research to international research and innovation activities: international scientific collaboration is important for capacity building, fostering research and innovation excellence, and integrating national research into global knowledge production networks (OECD, 2013).
- Promotion of open science and open innovation models: increased R&D co-operation and higher reliance on external sources have become important ways of sourcing knowledge for universities, PRIs and companies, in order to generate new ideas and bring them quickly to market. Open science models can facilitate greater access to data on a global scale and global participation in the research process, multiplying opportunities for international and cross-institutional collaboration. Open innovation promotes the linking of companies’ internal innovation units and processes with external actors, including research units.
- Geographical and cultural proximity: geographical proximity and good transport infrastructure are likely to facilitate international R&D linkages. Cultural and linguistic linkages between countries can also have a positive impact.
Barriers to international R&D linkages
- Limited skills base: countries with a low level of skills, particularly in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), are likely to receive less offers of international collaboration and inflows of foreign direct investment (FDI).
- Unfriendly intellectual property regimes: an IPR regime conducive to international scientific and research collaboration provides a further channel of promoting international R&D linkages.
- Limited presence of multinational companies: multinational companies are likely to engage in research programmes with universities and PRIs. Multinational corporations often have R&D units and their production systems in several countries, resulting in co-inventions and co-discoveries (OECD, 2011). Likewise, the capacity of companies, institutions and countries to engage and up-scale innovation activities will also determine the level of R&D collaboration, co-patenting and co-publication.
- Low levels of international mobility of scientists and researchers: researcher mobility is considered key for the production and diffusion of knowledge and innovation, and for establishing international R&D linkages.
- Brain drain: national or regional authorities will want to receive the appropriate compensation or reward for investing in education and innovation, and could fear that international R&D collaboration will lead to “brain drain”.
- Excessive regulations on technology sharing or selling to foreign companies and institutions: regulations on public research agencies and export policies on technology can limit the potential for innovation and research symbiosis.
Figure 2. The impact of scientific production and the extent of international scientific collaboration, 2003-09

- Mobility of scientists and engineers: mobility across companies, industries and academia can stimulate knowledge transfer, application of knowledge to new problems, and lead to the adoption of best practices, greater openness, creativity and innovation.
- R&D collaboration between firms and public sector research: universities and PRIs may provide access to firms to develop R&D infrastructures needed for the design and testing of innovation products and processes. Firms may not only use these infrastructures to solve their problems but also have an opportunity to learn from scientists and engineers sharing these facilities with their employees. R&D co-operation among firms can also achieve economies of scale and scope, and lower their transaction costs. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) should be a special focus, as they lack the financial, human and other resources needed to establish R&D linkages.
- IPR regimes: proper legal and regulatory frameworks providing guidance to universities, PRIs and companies on how benefits and/or ownership should be shared in the course of the research work could encourage research collaboration between universities and PRIs across countries.
- Open Science: ICT-based research platforms can serve as a “meeting point” for minds to interact, exchange and produce new knowledge, leading to new research questions and discoveries. These online platforms can have a multiplier effect on people-based knowledge exchange by increasing international R&D linkages, in terms of the participants and the flow of ideas and knowledge that is exchanged.
Table 1. Recent policy developments to promote international R&D Linkages
Policy instrument |
Objective of the policy |
Rationale |
Mechanism |
Governance models for international co-operation in STI |
Increasing international co-operation in STI to address global challenges. Improving international interactions and matching between universities, PRIs and firms R&D activities. |
Institutional failure |
Regulatory |
International co-operation strategies (e.g. Joint Programming Initiatives). |
Co-ordinating and harmonising priorities and research agendas, technology transfer initiatives, and international exchange of Scientifics. Reducing costs and duplication of efforts. Developing the absorptive capacity of national research systems and companies. Combining the comparative strengths of different countries. Sharing research infrastructures. |
Coordination and systemsfailures |
Regulatory |
Funding for participating in global R&D networks. |
Supporting participation in international calls involving universities, academic and PRIs across national borders. Detecting knowledge/capabilities/technologies located in other countries. |
Institutional failure |
Economic |
IPR regimes |
Developing IPR frameworks conductive to international scientific and research collaboration. Providing guidance to universities, PRIs and companies on how benefits and/or ownership should be shared in the course of the research work. |
Framework or Institutional failures |
Regulatory or information |
Setting global standards on emerging technologies. |
Facilitating international R&D co-operation. |
Framework failure |
Regulatory |
Promoting international research mobility (e.g. staff exchange, simplification of visa procedures). |
Encouraging joint publications, collaborative centres and joint employment staff. Improving the absorptive capacity of researchers and the socio-economic stakeholders. Promoting multidisciplinary research from universities and PRIs. |
Network failure |
Regulatory or economic |
Evaluation and monitoring of innovation systems and innovation strategies |
Identifying the strengths and mechanisms to participate in global R&D network. Evaluating national presence in the world technological scene. |
Institutional failure |
Regulatory |
Clusters policies |
Supporting SMEs, which increasingly have to compete internationally. Strengthening networking activities (e.g. thematic networks, S&T parks, technology platforms). |
Network failure |
Regulatory |
- Archibugi, D., & Iammarino, S. (2002), “The globalization of technological innovation: definition and evidence”, Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 98-122.
- Coe, D.T., E. Helpman and A. Hoffmaister (1997), “North-south R&D spillovers”, Economic Journal, Vol. 107, No. 440. pp 134-149.
- De Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2011), Global R&D Network: Network Analysis of International R&D Centres, Seville, Spain: JRC-IPTS.
- Edler, J., & Polt, W. (2008), “International industrial R&D - policy challenges: introduction to the special issue”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 331-336.
- Jin J., S. Wu, & J. Chen (2001), "International university-industry collaboration to bridge R&D globalization and national innovation system in China", Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, Vol. 3 Iss: 1 pp. 5 – 14.
- Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. (1999), “Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements”, Technovation, 19(5), 283-294.
- OECD (2013), “Science and technology performance and linkages in innovation in Southeast Asia”, OECD, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264128712-4-en
- OECD (2012), “Building international STI linkages”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_outlook-2012-25-en
- OECD (2011), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011, OECD, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2011-en
- OECD (2011), “Innovation today”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2011-8-en
- OECD (2011), PRIs: Mapping Sector Trends, OECD, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264119505-en
- OECD (2010), Project on the Transformation of PRIs: Case Study Results, OECD, Paris.

What Countries are Doing
- Processes and contributions of universities and PRIs
- Metrics and evaluation for universities and PRIs
- Demand for knowledge from universities and PRIs
- Research capabilities and resources of universities and PRIs
- Universities' and PRIs' access to research and engineering skills
- Research and engineering community norms and incentives
- Policy intervention on universities and PRIs